#71



Oh great. What an awful name for the product.
Originally posted by dunstonh


Poor old NS&I. Perhaps their thinking was "Well last time we gave it a sensible name and then the world gave it a misleading one.* Let's cut out the middle man and give it a misleading one from the start"



*65+ Bond -> Pensioner Bond

#77



Disappointed, the amount able to have been invested should have been much, much higher this Government is doing very little to incentivise saving.
Originally posted by nbrewitt


Because it doesn't grow the economy short term for them.



I'm amazed they've done this.

#80



Because it doesn't grow the economy short term for them.



I'm amazed they've done this.
Originally posted by PeacefulWaters


That's part of the problem, too much short term thinking, how on earth are we going to encourage the next generations to save

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron